A recent cartoon by our friend Johann Hauptmann reminded me that it is nearly time for my annual pilgrimage: once a year I bite the bullet, turn on the TV, and plant my rear-end on the couch to watch the World Series.
It is the only time I watch commercial television. I used to watch the Super Bowl, primarily for the funny ads, until they became less funny and more woke-preachy a few years ago. So I gave up on that.
I will do my best to make it through the Series though. If last year was any indication, I know what to expect: commercial after commercial of Black people driving new cars and living in split-level homes surrounded by, ironically, white picket fences; mixed-marriages with the token White person either cowering in the background or serving the food to the Black man of the house and his home-boys.
If a White man is featured in the ad, he will be inept and in need of some corrective action or appliance. If a White woman, she will be married to the Black guy. An alien from another planet watching TV today would assume that North America is composed of mostly Black and Brown people, with the odd melanin-challenged White individual, thrown in for diversity’s sake, who is likely gay.
Don’t believe me? Just watch. Last year I tallied thirty-five commercials where 50% or more featured Blacks as the majority, or only, race in the ad.
I’m not the only one who has noticed. In an American Thinker article published in 2022, writer Jacob Fraden asks “Why are Caucasians disappearing from TV commercials”, pointing out:
In the United States today, the White population (not including Hispanics) is 57.8%. In real life, Caucasians are still in the majority, but now on TV and the Internet, they are swept under the rug like trash. Blacks comprise 14% of the U.S. population but appear in 50% of commercials. White actors now appear to promote health insurance, gold, loans, and some medicines. Moreover, if a White person appears in a commercial, he/she is usually old, sick, a freak, or at the very least, an appendage to a Black partner. If there’s a doctor on the screen, he’s usually Black, while the patient is usually White. Caucasian young men appear in only 4% of the commercials!
His theory is that advertisers “ignore the long-standing rules of marketing, and to the detriment of their own financial interests, fill the media space with content that displaces and degrades its biggest market segment” to kowtow to the forces of political-correctness and “diversity”. He further postulates that most Whites take this lying down, instead of voicing their objections, out of fear for their jobs, of pecuniary retaliation, or damaging their social reputation. No one wants to be called a “racist”. Likewise, companies play-along for fear of “negative articles in the leftist press, social shunning, frivolous lawsuits, loss of state and federal licenses, government contracts, unexpected audits by the IRS, fines for alleged violations of minorities’ rights, and the like small and large troubles.”
Another article, this one by Frank S. Robinson simply titled “Why So Many Blacks in Ads?” posits a theory:
…for a lot of ads, the target audience is better educated, more affluent and, especially, younger consumers…That yuppie demographic is where the consumer-spending money is. And for them, blackness is actually attractive; connoting coolness, hipness, with-it-ness, knowing what’s going on. Not inferior but superior. And to this demographic, an America fully integrating blacks is a better America. Putting them in ads hence creates a positive buzz.
All well-and-good, but it is important to keep one thing in mind: Blacks aren’t actually making the TV ads. They are simply being dressed-up and cast in them. It’s called acting. Someone else is writing the script, directing the action, and placing the ad. Who might that be?
I’ll give you three-guesses where I’m going with this, but you’ll only need one. As my friend at Volk Talks says, we will be discussing “people who don’t celebrate Christmas.”
Without going too deep into the weeds, consider that the four largest advertising firms in the world are Publicis, WPP, Interpublic, and Omnicom. All but WPP are Jewish owned and directed.
The four largest advertisers on national television in 2023 in the United States were: Procter & Gamble—consumer goods; AbbVie—pharmaceuticals; GSK—pharmaceuticals; and Disney—globalist DEI propaganda machine. With the exception of GSK, a British company, the top institutional share holders for all of them are…drum roll please, are we ready to cite the refrain?… BlackRock (Jewish), State Street (Jewish), and Vanguard (seriously opaque).
And all of them use Jewish owned and managed Publicis as their primary advertising firm in the U.S.
Which brings us back to the upcoming World Series. This year while I’m muting the volume and cringing at the commercials as Black people try to sell White America more crap they don’t need, in my minds-eye I am going to replace the American flag waving in the background with a white flag featuring a blue stripe on the top and bottom and the Star of David smack in the middle of it.
Call it truth in advertising.
Amerika Erwache!
Leave a Reply